Net Present Value (NPV) of Informal Learning - A Better Investment Model?
This post was written by Jacob McNulty
A dollar today is worth more than a dollar tomorrow.
This is the basic underpinning to the concept of Net Present Value (NPV) in finance. Given the option, businesses are going to want their money in their own hands until the last possible second. The more time a company can hold on to their money, the more of a return the money can generate for the company.
This is the reason for some magazines offering subcriptions that steadily reduce as the years go on if you pay for them today. They want that money now! Even if it’s less than the full subscription you would have paid in three years, they would rather have it today to improve cashflow, invest, etc.
We discussed NPV in the Level 6: Beyond ROI class while I was at the CLO Institute in January. Ever since then I’ve been playing with the idea of NPV and how it relates to methods of learning that don’t fall under the category of ‘traditional.’
I decided to write after reading the July edition of Education Signals. One section of the report was about the ’Top 20 Companies in the Training Outsourcing Industry’ that is compiled by TrainingOutsourcing.com. In it, the authors share the following data points:
“The largest percentage of revenue from the leading players came from content development (35%) and training delivery (30%) services.”
Content design/development obviously comes at or near the beginning of a training outsourcing initiative. That means that over 1/3 of the money of contracts is in the hands of the training supplier soon after the project begins.
If I were in a position to be hiring a training outsourcing firm, I would look for a deal where the fees weren’t so front-loaded. I would want to keep my money as long as I could and let it make more money for me.
Enter informal learning (i.e. communities of practice, blogs, wikis, podcasts, etc.). As illustrated in this post from Jay Cross, and as others have been preaching, much of learning doesn’t come from ‘content.’ It comes through the informal and unscheduled channels of an organization.
Informal learning may have an additional advantage. Since there isn’t near the level of design/development required for informal methods as there is for more formal events such as workshops and e-learning modules, a company that was buying these services from an outsourcing company would pay less up front. This allows them to keep their money longer and let it make more money for them.
Although I’ve only cited one report that I’m basing this post on, I came from the instructional design world. We charged crazy fees (usually way more than 35% of the total contract) for design/development at my old firm and that was the first thing the client paid for. I also realize that there is a need for some structured content in a company’s learning and development plans - I just think it should be provided in minimal chunks.
I’m suggesting services that would be a double win for companies purchasing training outsourcing. With more informal elements in the mix to create a more diverse learning portfolio the client would not only receive more effective learning and development, they would pay less up front and get to make money from the money that they would have spent on instructional design and development fees.
Note: I’m consciously not addressing the area where training outsourcing firms make the second most amount of money - the 30% from delivery of training services. Informal learning, by nature, requires less delivery than its traditional counterpart. For this post, though, I wanted to emphasize the benefits of not paying design/development fees up front.
Tags: Action learning, Blended Learning, blog, business training, Chief Learning Officer, CLO, CLO Institute, Communities of Practice, CoP, corporate training, development, informal learning, learning, Learning Outsourcing, learning portfolio, learning strategies, learning system, net present value, NPV, organizational learning, outsourcing, outsourcing services, outsourcing solutions, professional development, Training Outsourcing, Wiki, workforce development